Advertisement
SAPIF vs SWSSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPIF is a Hold and SWSSF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SWSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAPIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SAPIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SWSSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SAPIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +232.76%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.79% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| SAPIF | SWSSF | SAPIF / SWSSF | |
| Capitalization | 12.8B | 30.8M | 41,558% |
| EBITDA | 852M | 17.2M | 4,953% |
| Gain YTD | 0.176 | 0.398 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.57 | 54.70 | 78% |
| Revenue | 19.1B | 242M | 7,893% |
| Total Cash | 296M | 3.94M | 7,515% |
| Total Debt | 3.44B | 112M | 3,067% |
SAPIF | SWSSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAPIF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWSSF (82). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
SWSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (92). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
SWSSF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (90). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.
SAPIF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSSF (46). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
SAPIF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWSSF (99). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.
| SAPIF | SWSSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 6 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UGA | 68.14 | 2.39 | +3.63% |
| United States Gasoline | |||
| CDL | 73.85 | 0.81 | +1.11% |
| VictoryShares US LgCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| ESML | 49.06 | 0.15 | +0.31% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | |||
| ZSC | 28.33 | N/A | N/A |
| USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy | |||
| TLCI | 26.35 | -0.46 | -1.72% |
| Touchstone International Equity ETF | |||
SAPIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAPIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAPIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DAR - SAPIF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| FLO - SAPIF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| NOMD - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CENTA - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| ASBFY - SAPIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
SWSSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSSF and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSSF and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWSSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DTEAF - SWSSF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PRRFY - SWSSF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| TATYF - SWSSF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TATYY - SWSSF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| SAPIF - SWSSF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||