SANG
Price
$6.44
Change
-$0.26 (-3.88%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:47 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
WONDF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

SANG vs WONDF

Header iconSANG vs WONDF Comparison
Open Charts SANG vs WONDFBanner chart's image
Sangoma Technologies
Price$6.44
Change-$0.26 (-3.88%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Wonderfi Technologies
Price$0.22
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$610.58K
CapitalizationN/A
SANG vs WONDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SANG vs. WONDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SANG is a Hold and WONDF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SANG: $6.70 vs. WONDF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: SANG and WONDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SANG: 31% vs. WONDF: 108%
Market capitalization -- SANG: $160.31M vs. WONDF: $85.66M
SANG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $160.31M. WONDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $85.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWONDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WONDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WONDF is a better buy in the long-term than SANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WONDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WONDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SANG (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.08% price change this week, while WONDF (@Packaged Software) price change was +34.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANG($160M) has a higher market cap than WONDF($85.7M). SANG YTD gains are higher at: 109.375 vs. WONDF (0.749). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5M vs. WONDF (-31.74M). SANG has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. WONDF (10M). WONDF has less debt than SANG: WONDF (247K) vs SANG (105M). SANG has higher revenues than WONDF: SANG (252M) vs WONDF (6.48M).
SANGWONDFSANG / WONDF
Capitalization160M85.7M187%
EBITDA17.5M-31.74M-55%
Gain YTD109.3750.74914,610%
P/E Ratio909.09N/A-
Revenue252M6.48M3,889%
Total Cash10.6M10M106%
Total Debt105M247K42,510%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANG: Fundamental Ratings
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WONDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BKKT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BKKT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
-2.62%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
OLB - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
VS - SANG
25%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
MARK - SANG
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
LIDR - SANG
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
More

WONDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WONDF and MARK have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WONDF and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WONDF
1D Price
Change %
WONDF100%
-3.92%
MARK - WONDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CORZ - WONDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
BMR - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
SANG - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
LQWDF - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.19%
More