SANG
Price
$5.61
Change
+$0.11 (+2.00%)
Updated
Sep 8, 02:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
187.14M
15 days until earnings call
WONDF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
167.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SANG vs WONDF

Header iconSANG vs WONDF Comparison
Open Charts SANG vs WONDFBanner chart's image
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.61
Change+$0.11 (+2.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization187.14M
Wonderfi Technologies
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78.46K
Capitalization167.95M
SANG vs WONDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SANG vs. WONDF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SANG is a StrongBuy and WONDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (SANG: $5.61 vs. WONDF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: SANG and WONDF are both not notable
SANG represents the Computer Communications, while WONDF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SANG: 141% vs. WONDF: 31%
Market capitalization -- SANG: $187.14M vs. WONDF: $167.95M
SANG [@Computer Communications] is valued at $187.14M. WONDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $167.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.7T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWONDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WONDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WONDF is a better buy in the long-term than SANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WONDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WONDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the short-term than WONDF.

Price Growth

SANG (@Computer Communications) experienced а -7.58% price change this week, while WONDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.99% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.97% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANG($187M) has a higher market cap than WONDF($168M). WONDF YTD gains are higher at: 22.275 vs. SANG (-22.969). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 43.1M vs. WONDF (-21.14M). WONDF has more cash in the bank: 31.9M vs. SANG (16.7M). WONDF has less debt than SANG: WONDF (2.1M) vs SANG (62.3M). SANG has higher revenues than WONDF: SANG (238M) vs WONDF (53.6M).
SANGWONDFSANG / WONDF
Capitalization187M168M111%
EBITDA43.1M-21.14M-204%
Gain YTD-22.96922.275-103%
P/E RatioN/A11.97-
Revenue238M53.6M444%
Total Cash16.7M31.9M52%
Total Debt62.3M2.1M2,967%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANG: Fundamental Ratings
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANGWONDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WONDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSIX15.230.26
+1.74%
Cullen Small Cap Value I
HLGZX37.030.09
+0.24%
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
RGGRX19.65N/A
N/A
Victory RS Global R6
LAAFX20.38-0.07
-0.34%
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
PUFCX20.78-0.34
-1.61%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services C

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
-3.37%
BTSGU - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
S - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BFRG - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
KSPI - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More

WONDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WONDF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WONDF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WONDF
1D Price
Change %
WONDF100%
+0.27%
CORZ - WONDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMR - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
SANG - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
LQWDF - WONDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
GB - WONDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More