SANA
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
632.68M
32 days until earnings call
SLNCF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.05 (-3.03%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
226.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SANA vs SLNCF

Header iconSANA vs SLNCF Comparison
Open Charts SANA vs SLNCFBanner chart's image
Sana Biotechnology
Price$2.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$44.15K
Capitalization632.68M
Silence Therapeutics
Price$1.60
Change-$0.05 (-3.03%)
Volume$250
Capitalization226.71M
SANA vs SLNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SANA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SANA vs. SLNCF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SANA is a Buy and SLNCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SANA: $2.87 vs. SLNCF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: SANA and SLNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SANA: 1% vs. SLNCF: 17%
Market capitalization -- SANA: $632.68M vs. SLNCF: $226.71M
SANA [@Biotechnology] is valued at $632.68M. SLNCF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $226.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $299.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SANA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SANA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SANA and SLNCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SANA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SANA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLNCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLNCF is a better buy in the short-term than SANA.

Price Growth

SANA (@Biotechnology) experienced а +9.96% price change this week, while SLNCF (@Biotechnology) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+4.13% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANA($633M) has a higher market cap than SLNCF($227M). SANA YTD gains are higher at: 76.074 vs. SLNCF (-39.048). SLNCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -71.65M vs. SANA (-195.34M). SLNCF has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. SANA (105M). SLNCF has less debt than SANA: SLNCF (60K) vs SANA (91.3M). SLNCF has higher revenues than SANA: SLNCF (27.7M) vs SANA (0).
SANASLNCFSANA / SLNCF
Capitalization633M227M279%
EBITDA-195.34M-71.65M273%
Gain YTD76.074-39.048-195%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue027.7M-
Total Cash105M137M77%
Total Debt91.3M60K152,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLNCF: Fundamental Ratings
SLNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANASLNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SANA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZIFIX11.910.11
+0.93%
American Beacon Ninety One Int Frn R5
GEGTX79.780.71
+0.90%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst
SELCX45.830.36
+0.79%
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
SPVZX25.280.10
+0.40%
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val Z
MGOCX34.090.12
+0.35%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class C

SANA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANA has been loosely correlated with VIR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SANA jumps, then VIR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANA
1D Price
Change %
SANA100%
N/A
VIR - SANA
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
CPRX - SANA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
ABSI - SANA
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
GBIO - SANA
39%
Loosely correlated
-15.40%
OLMA - SANA
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

SLNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNCF and RGLS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNCF and RGLS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNCF
1D Price
Change %
SLNCF100%
-3.03%
RGLS - SLNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NAMS - SLNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
SANA - SLNCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QLGN - SLNCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
APGE - SLNCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More