SAN
Price
$8.04
Change
+$0.05 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
76.74B
52 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$33.62
Change
+$0.77 (+2.34%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
98.65B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAN vs UBS

Header iconSAN vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts SAN vs UBSBanner chart's image
Banco Santander SA
Price$8.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.63%)
Volume$1.8M
Capitalization76.74B
UBS Group AG
Price$33.62
Change+$0.77 (+2.34%)
Volume$7.08M
Capitalization98.65B
SAN vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAN vs. UBS commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAN is a Buy and UBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SAN: $7.92 vs. UBS: $31.59)
Brand notoriety: SAN and UBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAN: 53% vs. UBS: 62%
Market capitalization -- SAN: $76.74B vs. UBS: $98.65B
SAN [@Major Banks] is valued at $76.74B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

SAN (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBS($98.7B) has a higher market cap than SAN($76.7B). SAN has higher P/E ratio than UBS: SAN (6.83) vs UBS (3.61). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 79.488 vs. UBS (7.538). SAN has less debt than UBS: SAN (311B) vs UBS (378B). SAN has higher revenues than UBS: SAN (59.9B) vs UBS (39.4B).
SANUBSSAN / UBS
Capitalization76.7B98.7B78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD79.4887.5381,055%
P/E Ratio6.833.61189%
Revenue59.9B39.4B152%
Total CashN/A144B-
Total Debt311B378B82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
SAN
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2718
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
412
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAN's Valuation (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (74). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (12). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (6). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (50). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (25). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
62%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
-1.61%
BBVA - SAN
84%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
ING - SAN
77%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
BCS - SAN
67%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
HSBC - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
UBS - SAN
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-1.40%
HSBC - UBS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BCS - UBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
C - UBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
BAC - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
JPM - UBS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More