SAN
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.07 (-0.64%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
158.77B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMFG
Price
$18.56
Change
-$0.23 (-1.22%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
117.47B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAN vs SMFG

Header iconSAN vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts SAN vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Banco Santander SA
Price$10.93
Change-$0.07 (-0.64%)
Volume$21.56K
Capitalization158.77B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$18.56
Change-$0.23 (-1.22%)
Volume$38.03K
Capitalization117.47B
SAN vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAN vs. SMFG commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAN is a StrongBuy and SMFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SAN: $11.02 vs. SMFG: $18.80)
Brand notoriety: SAN and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAN: 71% vs. SMFG: 47%
Market capitalization -- SAN: $158.77B vs. SMFG: $117.47B
SAN [@Major Banks] is valued at $158.77B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $117.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $840.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $140.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SAN and SMFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than SAN.

Price Growth

SAN (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.31% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +8.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.27% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($159B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($117B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than SAN: SMFG (13.33) vs SAN (11.06). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 156.280 vs. SMFG (29.710). SMFG has higher revenues than SAN: SMFG (5.11T) vs SAN (63.8B).
SANSMFGSAN / SMFG
Capitalization159B117B136%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD156.28029.710526%
P/E Ratio11.0613.3383%
Revenue63.8B5.11T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A31.54T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
SAN
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
211
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (82). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (11). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (43). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (33). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFXL44.510.22
+0.49%
Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares
OEF343.500.91
+0.27%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
FTQI20.820.05
+0.24%
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
PCGG11.930.01
+0.08%
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
SIFI44.51N/A
N/A
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+1.71%
BBVA - SAN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
BCS - SAN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
ING - SAN
70%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
HSBC - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
MUFG - SAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+2.15%
MUFG - SMFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
BCS - SMFG
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
C - SMFG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
HSBC - SMFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
SAN - SMFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More