SAN
Price
$12.12
Change
-$0.11 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
179.38B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMFG
Price
$21.36
Change
+$0.62 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
134.02B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAN vs SMFG

Header iconSAN vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts SAN vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.12
Change-$0.11 (-0.90%)
Volume$29.05K
Capitalization179.38B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$21.36
Change+$0.62 (+2.99%)
Volume$28.73K
Capitalization134.02B
SAN vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAN vs. SMFG commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAN is a Hold and SMFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (SAN: $12.22 vs. SMFG: $20.74)
Brand notoriety: SAN and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAN: 148% vs. SMFG: 144%
Market capitalization -- SAN: $179.38B vs. SMFG: $134.02B
SAN [@Major Banks] is valued at $179.38B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $134.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $830.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $144.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SAN and SMFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than SAN.

Price Growth

SAN (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.56% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.12% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($179B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($134B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than SAN: SMFG (15.34) vs SAN (12.43). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 7.294 vs. SAN (4.177). SAN has less debt than SMFG: SAN (317B) vs SMFG (31.73T). SMFG has higher revenues than SAN: SMFG (5.18T) vs SAN (63.8B).
SANSMFGSAN / SMFG
Capitalization179B134B134%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1777.29457%
P/E Ratio12.4315.3481%
Revenue63.8B5.18T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt317B31.73T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
SAN
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
930
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (83). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (8). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (40). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (30). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XBIL50.12N/A
N/A
F/m US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
RMCA24.27N/A
N/A
Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF
ADPV45.28-0.38
-0.83%
Adaptiv™ Select ETF
CTEC58.49-0.67
-1.14%
Global X CleanTech ETF
XLY122.25-1.96
-1.58%
State Street® CnsmrDiscSelSectSPDR®ETF

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+0.25%
BBVA - SAN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
BCS - SAN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ING - SAN
71%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
HSBC - SAN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
MUFG - SAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+1.02%
MUFG - SMFG
90%
Closely correlated
+3.83%
BCS - SMFG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
C - SMFG
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
BK - SMFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
SAN - SMFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More