It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SAM (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +2.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.
SAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 01, 2026.
The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| SAM | STZ | SAM / STZ | |
| Capitalization | 2.14B | 24B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 275M | 2.55B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | -33.046 | -35.934 | 92% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.33 | 20.10 | 116% |
| Revenue | 2.05B | 9.62B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 212M | 200M | 106% |
| Total Debt | 43.9M | 10.5B | 0% |
SAM | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STZ's Valuation (44) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (83). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (100). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's SMR Rating (52) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (76). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (78). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
SAM's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (99). This means that SAM’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| SAM | STZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 37% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVNT | 12.04 | 0.06 | +0.46% |
| AltShares Event-Driven ETF | |||
| SIXO | 34.52 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF | |||
| GEOA | 32.19 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund | |||
| RING | 69.07 | -0.48 | -0.69% |
| iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | |||
| FAZ | 41.45 | -1.64 | -3.81% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAM has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAM jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.