SAFT
Price
$79.27
Change
+$10.07 (+14.55%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$36.59
Change
+$5.82 (+18.91%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
933.57M
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAFT vs UFCS

Header iconSAFT vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts SAFT vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Safety Insurance Group
Price$79.27
Change+$10.07 (+14.55%)
Volume$73.44K
Capitalization1.18B
United Fire Group
Price$36.59
Change+$5.82 (+18.91%)
Volume$92.61K
Capitalization933.57M
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAFT vs. UFCS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAFT is a Buy and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (SAFT: $79.27 vs. UFCS: $36.59)
Brand notoriety: SAFT and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAFT: 86% vs. UFCS: 80%
Market capitalization -- SAFT: $1.18B vs. UFCS: $933.57M
SAFT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.18B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $933.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $123.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAFT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.54% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.18B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($934M). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: SAFT (13.50) vs UFCS (8.63). SAFT YTD gains are higher at: 1.746 vs. UFCS (0.660). SAFT has less debt than UFCS: SAFT (42.6M) vs UFCS (146M). UFCS has higher revenues than SAFT: UFCS (1.35B) vs SAFT (1.22B).
SAFTUFCSSAFT / UFCS
Capitalization1.18B934M126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.7460.660264%
P/E Ratio13.508.63156%
Revenue1.22B1.35B90%
Total Cash658MN/A-
Total Debt42.6M146M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAFT vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
SAFT
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6957
SMR RATING
1..100
7163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (42). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (69). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (63) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (71). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (50). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (83). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAFTUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAFT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGLNX11.380.24
+2.15%
Eagle Energy Infrastructure N
FAFCX35.05N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials C
GTSGX16.71-0.02
-0.12%
Madison Mid Cap Y
MISEX43.94-0.41
-0.92%
Midas Special Opportunities
MFRCX45.62-0.50
-1.08%
MFS Research C

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.29%
CNA - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
HIG - SAFT
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
THG - SAFT
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
TRV - SAFT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
CINF - SAFT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+0.44%
SAFT - UFCS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CINF - UFCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
CNA - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
ORI - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
THG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More