Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SACEX vs SPMHX
SACEX vs SPMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SACEX vs. SPMHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SACEX is a Hold and SPMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMHX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. SACEX (143M). SACEX pays higher dividends than SPMHX: SACEX (17.02) vs SPMHX (5.59). SACEX was incepted earlier than SPMHX: SACEX (10 years) vs SPMHX (7 years). SPMHX (6.29) is less costly to investors than SACEX (2.23). SPMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. SACEX (13.00). SACEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMHX: SACEX (500) vs SPMHX (1000000). SPMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. SACEX (-4.62). SPMHX return over 5 years is better than : 192.69 vs. SACEX (111.14).
| SACEX | SPMHX | SACEX / SPMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 6.29 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 6.29 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.875 | 2.701 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143M | 1.06B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 17.02 | 5.59 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | 1.47 | -314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.86 | 73.23 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.14 | 192.69 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |