S
Price
$19.56
Change
+$0.09 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.13B
31 days until earnings call
XYZ
Price
$80.74
Change
+$0.97 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
52.08B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

S vs XYZ

Header iconS vs XYZ Comparison
Open Charts S vs XYZBanner chart's image
SentinelOne
Price$19.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.46%)
Volume$6.71M
Capitalization7.13B
Block
Price$80.74
Change+$0.97 (+1.22%)
Volume$6.35M
Capitalization52.08B
S vs XYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
S vs. XYZ commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a Buy and XYZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (S: $19.56 vs. XYZ: $80.74)
Brand notoriety: S and XYZ are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: S: 97% vs. XYZ: 57%
Market capitalization -- S: $7.13B vs. XYZ: $52.08B
S [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.13B. XYZ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both S and XYZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

S’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • S’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XYZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the short-term than XYZ.

Price Growth

S (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.61% price change this week, while XYZ (@Packaged Software) price change was +10.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

XYZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.37% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XYZ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than S($7.13B). XYZ YTD gains are higher at: -5.001 vs. S (-11.892). XYZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. S (-292.71M). XYZ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. S (926M). S has less debt than XYZ: S (22.9M) vs XYZ (6.07B). XYZ has higher revenues than S: XYZ (21.9B) vs S (621M).
SXYZS / XYZ
Capitalization7.13B52.1B14%
EBITDA-292.71M790M-37%
Gain YTD-11.892-5.001238%
P/E RatioN/A4073.00-
Revenue621M21.9B3%
Total Cash926M9.02B10%
Total Debt22.9M6.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
S vs XYZ: Fundamental Ratings
S
XYZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
9560
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (68) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as XYZ (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

S's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's SMR Rating (60) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that XYZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

XYZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as S (57) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that XYZ’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for XYZ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than XYZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SXYZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVMC68.500.45
+0.66%
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
KFEB25.44-0.01
-0.06%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb
EWX63.79-0.19
-0.30%
SPDR® S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
FCO6.48-0.02
-0.31%
abrdn Global Income Fund
GLDM66.09-0.63
-0.94%
SPDR® Gold MiniShares

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+0.36%
SNPS - S
68%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
HUBS - S
67%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
CRM - S
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
PANW - S
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
CDNS - S
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
More

XYZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYZ has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XYZ jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYZ
1D Price
Change %
XYZ100%
+1.22%
AFRM - XYZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
DBX - XYZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
SHOP - XYZ
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDDY - XYZ
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
S - XYZ
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More