It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVEEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
S’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VEEV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
S (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while VEEV (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.19%.
S is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
VEEV is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
S | VEEV | S / VEEV | |
Capitalization | 7.13B | 37.2B | 19% |
EBITDA | -292.71M | 462M | -63% |
Gain YTD | -12.828 | 17.603 | -73% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 71.55 | - |
Revenue | 621M | 2.36B | 26% |
Total Cash | 926M | 4.03B | 23% |
Total Debt | 22.9M | 55.8M | 41% |
S | VEEV | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (68) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as VEEV (71) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
VEEV's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VEEV’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
VEEV's SMR Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VEEV’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
VEEV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (56) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VEEV’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for VEEV (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
S | VEEV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 1 day ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 1 day ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 1 day ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago81% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago78% | 3 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 1 day ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEEV has been loosely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VEEV jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VEEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VEEV | 100% | +0.77% | ||
MDB - VEEV | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
PHR - VEEV | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
ALRM - VEEV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
S - VEEV | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
DOCU - VEEV | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More |