S
Price
$22.43
Change
+$0.10 (+0.45%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
86 days until earnings call
SQ
Price
$89.65
Change
+$2.01 (+2.29%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

S vs SQ

Header iconS vs SQ Comparison
Open Charts S vs SQBanner chart's image
SentinelOne
Price$22.43
Change+$0.10 (+0.45%)
Volume$11.42M
CapitalizationN/A
Block
Price$89.65
Change+$2.01 (+2.29%)
Volume$8.83M
CapitalizationN/A
S vs SQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
S vs. SQ commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a Hold and SQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (S: $22.43 vs. SQ: $89.65)
Brand notoriety: S and SQ are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: S: 232% vs. SQ: 100%
Market capitalization -- S: $7.13B vs. SQ: $52.08B
S [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.13B. SQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $52.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both S and SQ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

S’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both S and SQ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

S (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.19% price change this week, while SQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

S is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

SQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQ($52.1B) has a higher market cap than S($7.13B). SQ YTD gains are higher at: 15.902 vs. S (-18.258). SQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 790M vs. S (-292.71M). SQ has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. S (926M). S has less debt than SQ: S (22.9M) vs SQ (6.07B). SQ has higher revenues than S: SQ (21.9B) vs S (621M).
SSQS / SQ
Capitalization7.13B52.1B14%
EBITDA-292.71M790M-37%
Gain YTD-18.25815.902-115%
P/E RatioN/A4073.00-
Revenue621M21.9B3%
Total Cash926M9.02B10%
Total Debt22.9M6.07B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
S vs SQ: Fundamental Ratings
S
SQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7567
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7087
SMR RATING
1..100
9589
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SQ's Valuation (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as S (69) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SQ’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SQ (87) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SQ’s over the last 12 months.

SQ's SMR Rating (89) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SQ’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

SQ's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as S (61) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SQ’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQ (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than SQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+0.45%
DDOG - S
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
SNPS - S
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
MDB - S
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
AMPL - S
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
PDFS - S
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
More

SQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQ has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQ jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQ
1D Price
Change %
SQ100%
+2.29%
AFRM - SQ
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
BILL - SQ
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
SSNC - SQ
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
QTWO - SQ
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
S - SQ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More