Advertisement
S vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a StrongBuy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
S’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
S (@Computer Communications) experienced а +11.20% price change this week, while SNPS (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.
SNPS is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.17% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| S | SNPS | S / SNPS | |
| Capitalization | 6.29B | 112B | 6% |
| EBITDA | -240.23M | 1.8B | -13% |
| Gain YTD | -15.045 | 24.345 | -62% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 69.77 | - |
| Revenue | 864M | 6.22B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 767M | 14.3B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 12.6M | 10.7B | 0% |
S | SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (79) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SNPS (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (82) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's SMR Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (97) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (60) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SNPS (22) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
| S | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EXHAX | 26.73 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S | |||
| RWMCX | 65.01 | -0.22 | -0.34% |
| American Funds Washington Mutual R3 | |||
| VYMVX | 18.83 | -0.08 | -0.42% |
| Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap R | |||
| MGHRX | 71.67 | -0.49 | -0.68% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Growth IR | |||
| JACAX | 56.72 | -0.99 | -1.72% |
| Janus Henderson VIT Forty Instl | |||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| QTWO - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CRM - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||