S vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a Hold and SNPS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
S’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
S (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while SNPS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
SNPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| S | SNPS | S / SNPS | |
| Capitalization | 7.13B | 88B | 8% |
| EBITDA | -292.71M | 1.74B | -17% |
| Gain YTD | -12.828 | -0.590 | 2,173% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 63.66 | - |
| Revenue | 621M | 6.13B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 926M | 1.27B | 73% |
| Total Debt | 22.9M | 670M | 3% |
S | SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (68) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SNPS (89) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's SMR Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SNPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SNPS (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNPS (81) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
| S | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| DDOG - SNPS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| S - SNPS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||