S
Price
$18.26
Change
-$0.47 (-2.51%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.25B
92 days until earnings call
SANG
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 8, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
189.88M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

S vs SANG

Header iconS vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts S vs SANGBanner chart's image
SentinelOne
Price$18.26
Change-$0.47 (-2.51%)
Volume$536
Capitalization6.25B
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization189.88M
S vs SANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
S vs. SANG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a Hold and SANG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (S: $18.73 vs. SANG: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: S: Notable vs. SANG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: S: 66% vs. SANG: 38%
Market capitalization -- S: $6.25B vs. SANG: $189.88M
S [@Computer Communications] is valued at $6.25B. SANG’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $189.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the long-term than SANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

S’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the short-term than SANG.

Price Growth

S (@Computer Communications) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while SANG (@Computer Communications) price change was -9.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

S is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.85% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
S($6.25B) has a higher market cap than SANG($190M). S YTD gains are higher at: -15.631 vs. SANG (-22.969). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 43.1M vs. S (-240.23M). S has more cash in the bank: 767M vs. SANG (16.7M). S has less debt than SANG: S (12.6M) vs SANG (62.3M). S has higher revenues than SANG: S (864M) vs SANG (238M).
SSANGS / SANG
Capitalization6.25B190M3,288%
EBITDA-240.23M43.1M-557%
Gain YTD-15.631-22.96968%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue864M238M363%
Total Cash767M16.7M4,593%
Total Debt12.6M62.3M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
S vs SANG: Fundamental Ratings
S
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (78) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SANG (97) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

S's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SANG (100) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as S (97) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SANG (59) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANG (51) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRUMY17.850.10
+0.56%
Terumo Corp.
IDRSF3.30N/A
N/A
Idorsia AG
NROM0.21N/A
N/A
Noble Roman's, Inc.
BUHPF4.85N/A
N/A
Bumrungrad Hospital Public Co., Ltd.
NSRCF0.32-0.02
-5.33%
Nextsource Materials Inc.

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+3.20%
HUBS - S
67%
Closely correlated
+5.00%
SNPS - S
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
CRM - S
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
CRWD - S
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
NET - S
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
-3.37%
BTSGU - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
S - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BFRG - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
KSPI - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More