Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYSGX vs WCMLX
RYSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RYSGX vs WCMLX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth A
Price$53.67
Change-$1.31 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
RYSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 41.9M vs. RYSGX (4.63M). RYSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: RYSGX (0.02) vs WCMLX (0.00). RYSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RYSGX (21 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RYSGX (1.60). RYSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3105.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). RYSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: RYSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. RYSGX (-10.48). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. RYSGX (-20.51).
| RYSGX | WCMLX | RYSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.99 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.79 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.079 | 6.454 | 125% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.63M | 41.9M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.48 | -2.98 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.80 | 22.89 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.51 | 4.74 | -432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement