It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RYLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RYLPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
RYLPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while SRTS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.11%.
SRTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| RYLPF | SRTS | RYLPF / SRTS | |
| Capitalization | 25.6B | 63.9M | 40,063% |
| EBITDA | 2.41B | -829K | -290,953% |
| Gain YTD | 6.479 | -43.786 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 142.23 | 31.50 | 452% |
| Revenue | 17.9B | 37.6M | 47,606% |
| Total Cash | 1.82B | 22.2M | 8,216% |
| Total Debt | 8.43B | 595K | 1,416,134% |
RYLPF | SRTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RYLPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRTS (63) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
SRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RYLPF (100) in the null industry. This means that SRTS’s stock grew similarly to RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTS (90) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTS (63) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTS (15) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
| RYLPF | SRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FAN | 20.37 | 0.47 | +2.35% |
| First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | |||
| VIOG | 125.57 | 2.19 | +1.77% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |||
| BMAX | 24.42 | 0.20 | +0.82% |
| Rex Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | |||
| BIV | 78.05 | 0.25 | +0.32% |
| Vanguard Interm-Term Bond ETF | |||
| MARB | 20.72 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYLPF has been loosely correlated with PHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYLPF jumps, then PHG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYLPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLPF | 100% | +2.81% | ||
| PHG - RYLPF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| SNNUF - RYLPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDGL - RYLPF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| RSCF - RYLPF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAFLY - RYLPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRTS has been loosely correlated with LUNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRTS jumps, then LUNG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRTS | 100% | -2.75% | ||
| LUNG - SRTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| VAPO - SRTS | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HOLX - SRTS | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTD - SRTS | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| PLSE - SRTS | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.17% | ||
More | ||||