Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCFX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.46B vs. RYCFX (84.9M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: SHSAX (0.22) vs RYCFX (0.00). RYCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RYCFX (24 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs RYCFX (2500). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.81 vs. RYCFX (-19.33). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.30 vs. RYCFX (-43.62).
| RYCFX | SHSAX | RYCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.09 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.09 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.739 | -0.817 | -90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.9M | 6.46B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.33 | -11.81 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.47 | -7.36 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.62 | -8.30 | 526% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.07 | 10.50 | -506% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers