Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCFX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.25B vs. RYCFX (90.4M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: SHSAX (0.23) vs RYCFX (0.00). RYCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RYCFX (24 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs RYCFX (2500). SHSAX (-16.25) and RYCFX (-16.62) have marching annual gain over last year. SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.34 vs. RYCFX (-33.36).
| RYCFX | SHSAX | RYCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.09 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.09 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.574 | -3.555 | -326% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.4M | 6.25B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.62 | -16.25 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.83 | 0.40 | -208% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.36 | -13.34 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.61 | 12.07 | -370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers