Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WTRCX
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WTRCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
Nomura Core Equity Fund
Price$10.99
Change-$2.41 (-17.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.73B
RWMFX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WTRCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WTRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. WTRCX (3.73B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWMFX (1.45) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WTRCX (33 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWMFX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. WTRCX (-9.17). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. WTRCX (-23.07).
| RWMFX | WTRCX | RWMFX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.520 | 1.197 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208B | 3.73B | 5,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | -9.17 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | -2.51 | -1,218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | -23.07 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.02 | 6.49 | 1,511% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers