Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SPINX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
SEI S&P 500 Index A (SIIT)
Price$21.60
Change+$0.09 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SPINX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SPINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. SPINX (4.51B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SPINX: RWMFX (1.48) vs SPINX (1.18). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SPINX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SPINX (12 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SPINX (6.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: RWMFX (250) vs SPINX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. SPINX (-3.63). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.74 vs. SPINX (34.63).
| RWMFX | SPINX | RWMFX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.05 | 620% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.001 | 9.384 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 4.51B | 4,522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | -3.63 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 16.23 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.74 | 34.63 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | 118.81 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement