Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLYCX
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLYCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.84
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLYCX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SLYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. SLYCX (1.52B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLYCX: RWMFX (1.47) vs SLYCX (0.82). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLYCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SLYCX (11 years). SLYCX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs SLYCX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. SLYCX (-1.68). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.81 vs. SLYCX (-3.60).
| RWMFX | SLYCX | RWMFX / SLYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.65 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.594 | 1.990 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208B | 1.52B | 13,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.82 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | -1.68 | -541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.31 | 11.26 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.81 | -3.60 | -1,134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.28 | 42.52 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement