Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLYCX
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLYCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLYCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SLYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. SLYCX (1.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLYCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs SLYCX (0.77). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLYCX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SLYCX (11 years). SLYCX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs SLYCX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. SLYCX (-2.77). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.29 vs. SLYCX (18.95).
| RWMFX | SLYCX | RWMFX / SLYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.760 | 13.856 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206B | 1.53B | 13,508% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.77 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | -2.77 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.84 | 28.16 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.29 | 18.95 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.57 | 24.88 | 320% |