Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLGFX
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.95
Change-$0.64 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.44B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$20.10
Change-$0.23 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLGFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. SLGFX (1.14B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLGFX: RWMFX (1.47) vs SLGFX (1.07). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). SLGFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWMFX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. RWMFX (4.65). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.73 vs. RWMFX (51.87).
| RWMFX | SLGFX | RWMFX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.25 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.465 | 1.966 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194B | 1.14B | 16,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.07 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 7.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.78 | 59.62 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.87 | 98.73 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement