Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLGFX
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$21.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLGFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. SLGFX (1.2B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLGFX: RWMFX (1.48) vs SLGFX (1.02). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). SLGFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWMFX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. RWMFX (9.60). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.28 vs. RWMFX (54.74).
| RWMFX | SLGFX | RWMFX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.25 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.001 | 9.136 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 1.2B | 17,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.02 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 15.58 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 62.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.74 | 100.28 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.42 | N/A | - |