Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SICWX
RWMFX vs SICWX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SICWX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Y
Price$79.09
Change-$0.17 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.58B
RWMFX vs SICWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SICWX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SICWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. SICWX (3.58B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SICWX: RWMFX (1.43) vs SICWX (0.46). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SICWX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SICWX (18 years). SICWX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SICWX (6.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SICWX: RWMFX (250) vs SICWX (2500). SICWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.38 vs. RWMFX (9.85). SICWX return over 5 years is better than : 69.72 vs. RWMFX (51.83).
| RWMFX | SICWX | RWMFX / SICWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.74 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.80 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.475 | 11.851 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205B | 3.58B | 5,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.46 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.85 | 20.38 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.71 | 59.73 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.83 | 69.72 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.03 | 112.18 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement