Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SCPAX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
SEI Large Cap Disciplined Eq A (SIIT)
Price$11.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SCPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SCPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. SCPAX (1.37B). SCPAX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: SCPAX (2.64) vs RWMFX (1.42). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SCPAX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SCPAX (22 years). SCPAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPAX: RWMFX (250) vs SCPAX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. SCPAX (-2.49). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.29 vs. SCPAX (21.65).
| RWMFX | SCPAX | RWMFX / SCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.760 | 13.143 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206B | 1.37B | 15,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 2.64 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | -2.49 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.84 | 47.55 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.29 | 21.65 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.57 | 6.58 | 1,210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement