Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs SLGFX
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$61.59
Change-$0.63 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.44B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$20.10
Change-$0.23 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. SLGFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. SLGFX (1.14B). SLGFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: SLGFX (1.07) vs RWEBX (0.80). RWEBX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWEBX (11 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than SLGFX (0.64). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWEBX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. RWEBX (3.84). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.73 vs. RWEBX (47.99).
| RWEBX | SLGFX | RWEBX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.64 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.116 | 1.966 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194B | 1.14B | 16,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 7.72 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 59.62 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.99 | 98.73 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement