Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs SLGFX
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$21.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. SLGFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. SLGFX (1.2B). SLGFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: SLGFX (1.02) vs RWEBX (0.80). RWEBX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWEBX (11 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than SLGFX (0.64). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWEBX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. RWEBX (8.72). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.28 vs. RWEBX (50.49).
| RWEBX | SLGFX | RWEBX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.64 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.518 | 9.136 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 1.2B | 17,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | 15.58 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.74 | 62.70 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.49 | 100.28 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement