Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs SFLNX
RWEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$31.26
Change+$0.19 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.38B
RWEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Hold and SFLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. SFLNX (10.4B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: SFLNX (1.58) vs RWEBX (0.76). RWEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RWEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (19 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RWEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RWEBX (3.29). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 90.87 vs. RWEBX (45.88).
| RWEBX | SFLNX | RWEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.079 | 12.204 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206B | 10.4B | 1,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.58 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 10.03 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.78 | 61.29 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.88 | 90.87 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.45 | 128.65 | 57% |