Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RVVHX vs SSGSX
RVVHX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RVVHX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Value Investment
Price$10.38
Change-$0.11 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.65M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
RVVHX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RVVHX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RVVHX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. RVVHX (99.6M). RVVHX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RVVHX (1.22) vs SSGSX (0.50). RVVHX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RVVHX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RVVHX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RVVHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RVVHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RVVHX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). RVVHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.43 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). RVVHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| RVVHX | SSGSX | RVVHX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.26 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.181 | -2.025 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.6M | 5.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.50 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | -5.53 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.33 | -9.76 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 15.88 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.01 | 15.23 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers