RVSDF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.83M
SBYSF
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.02 (+1.13%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RVSDF vs SBYSF

Header iconRVSDF vs SBYSF Comparison
Open Charts RVSDF vs SBYSFBanner chart's image
Riverside Resources, Inc. New
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.6K
Capitalization9.83M
Sibanye Stillwater
Price$1.79
Change+$0.02 (+1.13%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.42B
RVSDF vs SBYSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RVSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RVSDF vs. SBYSF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RVSDF is a Buy and SBYSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RVSDF: $0.11 vs. SBYSF: $1.79)
Brand notoriety: RVSDF and SBYSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RVSDF: 6% vs. SBYSF: 48%
Market capitalization -- RVSDF: $9.83M vs. SBYSF: $5.42B
RVSDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.83M. SBYSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RVSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBYSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RVSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBYSF is a better buy in the long-term than RVSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RVSDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBYSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RVSDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SBYSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVSDF is a better buy in the short-term than SBYSF.

Price Growth

RVSDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while SBYSF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBYSF($5.42B) has a higher market cap than RVSDF($9.83M). RVSDF has higher P/E ratio than SBYSF: RVSDF (13.37) vs SBYSF (4.89). SBYSF YTD gains are higher at: 100.560 vs. RVSDF (19.500). SBYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1B vs. RVSDF (-198.6K). SBYSF has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. RVSDF (8.72M). RVSDF has less debt than SBYSF: RVSDF (33.6K) vs SBYSF (21.2B). SBYSF has higher revenues than RVSDF: SBYSF (153B) vs RVSDF (0).
RVSDFSBYSFRVSDF / SBYSF
Capitalization9.83M5.42B0%
EBITDA-198.6K33.1B-0%
Gain YTD19.500100.56019%
P/E Ratio13.374.89273%
Revenue0153B-
Total Cash8.72M27.2B0%
Total Debt33.6K21.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RVSDF vs SBYSF: Fundamental Ratings
RVSDF
SBYSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9340
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBYSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVSDF (75). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RVSDF (100). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVSDF (93). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RVSDF (62). This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to RVSDF’s over the last 12 months.

RVSDF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBYSF (68). This means that RVSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RVSDFSBYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RVSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY614.913.04
+0.50%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107327.700000239.273440
+0.22%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL201.00N/A
N/A
Apple
TSLA323.63-2.15
-0.66%
Tesla
GME23.59-0.29
-1.21%
GameStop Corp

RVSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVSDF and CMCL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVSDF and CMCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVSDF
1D Price
Change %
RVSDF100%
-0.64%
CMCL - RVSDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
NEWP - RVSDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
CAPTF - RVSDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
CNL - RVSDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
ORLA - RVSDF
18%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
More

SBYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBYSF and CCHI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBYSF and CCHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBYSF
1D Price
Change %
SBYSF100%
N/A
CCHI - SBYSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCHDF - SBYSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ENDMF - SBYSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDRC - SBYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
RVSDF - SBYSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More