Advertisement
RUSHA vs VVV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSHA is a Hold and VVV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VVV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VVV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +2.55% price change this week, while VVV (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
VVV is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+3.46% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| RUSHA | VVV | RUSHA / VVV | |
| Capitalization | 4.38B | 5B | 88% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 559M | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.949 | 8.706 | 45% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.06 | 18.38 | 87% |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.67B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 61.9M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.73B | 1.37B | 126% |
RUSHA | VVV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VVV (73) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as VVV (38) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to VVV’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's SMR Rating (12) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
VVV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RUSHA (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VVV’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VVV (89) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VVV’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | VVV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIECX | 46.14 | 0.49 | +1.07% |
| BNY Mellon International Core Equity C | |||
| GSGRX | 48.72 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income A | |||
| RMFCX | 60.07 | -0.15 | -0.25% |
| American Funds American Mutual R3 | |||
| FSGAX | 48.69 | -0.14 | -0.29% |
| Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv | |||
| FSLCX | 19.16 | -0.12 | -0.62% |
| Fidelity Small Cap Stock | |||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
VVV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VVV has been loosely correlated with KMX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VVV jumps, then KMX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VVV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VVV | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| KMX - VVV | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| RUSHA - VVV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| DRVN - VVV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| AN - VVV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| PAG - VVV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||