RUSHA
Price
$56.28
Change
-$1.10 (-1.92%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.48B
32 days until earnings call
TKLF
Price
$3.61
Change
-$0.17 (-4.50%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RUSHA vs TKLF

Header iconRUSHA vs TKLF Comparison
Open Charts RUSHA vs TKLFBanner chart's image
Rush Enterprises
Price$56.28
Change-$1.10 (-1.92%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization4.48B
Tokyo Lifestyle
Price$3.61
Change-$0.17 (-4.50%)
Volume$200
Capitalization16M
RUSHA vs TKLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RUSHA vs. TKLF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSHA is a Buy and TKLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RUSHA: $56.28 vs. TKLF: $3.61)
Brand notoriety: RUSHA and TKLF are both not notable
RUSHA represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while TKLF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RUSHA: 28% vs. TKLF: 772%
Market capitalization -- RUSHA: $4.48B vs. TKLF: $16M
RUSHA [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $4.48B. TKLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $51.28B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTKLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than TKLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TKLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RUSHA and TKLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while TKLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.47% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (+0.83% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.48B) has a higher market cap than TKLF($16M). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than TKLF: RUSHA (16.35) vs TKLF (2.36). TKLF YTD gains are higher at: 9.063 vs. RUSHA (3.783). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. TKLF (11.4M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. TKLF (3.08M). TKLF has less debt than RUSHA: TKLF (71.6M) vs RUSHA (1.75B). RUSHA has higher revenues than TKLF: RUSHA (7.69B) vs TKLF (220M).
RUSHATKLFRUSHA / TKLF
Capitalization4.48B16M28,013%
EBITDA682M11.4M5,982%
Gain YTD3.7839.06342%
P/E Ratio16.352.36692%
Revenue7.69B220M3,494%
Total Cash211M3.08M6,857%
Total Debt1.75B71.6M2,450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RUSHATKLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKGCX20.82N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
SPICX66.69N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Index C
STSGX13.25N/A
N/A
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Inv
CIBFX78.32N/A
N/A
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
EIVPX16.74N/A
N/A
Parametric Volatil Risk Prm-Defensv I

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-1.92%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
AN - RUSHA
70%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
GPI - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

TKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKLF has been loosely correlated with CYYHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TKLF jumps, then CYYHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKLF
1D Price
Change %
TKLF100%
-4.50%
CYYHF - TKLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SBH - TKLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
HZO - TKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
RUSHA - TKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
WINA - TKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More