Advertisement
RUSHA vs TBHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSHA is a Buy and TBHC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while TBHC (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
TBHC is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.44% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
@Home Improvement Chains (-0.26% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
| RUSHA | TBHC | RUSHA / TBHC | |
| Capitalization | 4.29B | 27.9M | 15,373% |
| EBITDA | 691M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.365 | -23.457 | -6% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.72 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.78B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 229M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.73B | N/A | - |
RUSHA | TBHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (36) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TBHC (49) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBHC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TBHC (59) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBHC (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | TBHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 72% | 21 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
TBHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBHC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| FLWS - TBHC | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| RH - TBHC | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ONEW - TBHC | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.24% | ||
| RUSHA - TBHC | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ASO - TBHC | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||