RUSHA
Price
$58.28
Change
-$0.24 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.55B
52 days until earnings call
TBHC
Price
$1.72
Change
+$0.18 (+11.69%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.63M
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RUSHA vs TBHC

Header iconRUSHA vs TBHC Comparison
Open Charts RUSHA vs TBHCBanner chart's image
Rush Enterprises
Price$58.28
Change-$0.24 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization4.55B
THE BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE
Price$1.72
Change+$0.18 (+11.69%)
Volume$5.52K
Capitalization38.63M
RUSHA vs TBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RUSHA vs. TBHC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSHA is a Buy and TBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RUSHA: $58.52 vs. TBHC: $1.54)
Brand notoriety: RUSHA and TBHC are both not notable
RUSHA represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while TBHC is part of the Home Improvement Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RUSHA: 57% vs. TBHC: 21%
Market capitalization -- RUSHA: $4.55B vs. TBHC: $38.63M
RUSHA [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $4.55B. TBHC’s [@Home Improvement Chains] market capitalization is $38.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $417.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $44.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than TBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBHC is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHA.

Price Growth

RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while TBHC (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

TBHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.30% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Home Improvement Chains (+0.88% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.55B) has a higher market cap than TBHC($38.6M). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 7.913 vs. TBHC (-4.938).
RUSHATBHCRUSHA / TBHC
Capitalization4.55B38.6M11,788%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.913-4.938-160%
P/E Ratio16.59N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.75BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHA vs TBHC: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHA
TBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
57100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (36) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TBHC (50) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBHC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (50) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RUSHATBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COE44.473.83
+9.42%
51Talk Online Education Group
MTH81.504.72
+6.15%
Meritage Homes Corporation
INVX17.260.65
+3.91%
Innovex International Inc
BBVA18.460.47
+2.61%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
SWAG1.80-0.01
-0.55%
Stran & Company

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+2.58%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+3.59%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
GPI - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
More

TBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBHC
1D Price
Change %
TBHC100%
+3.36%
FLWS - TBHC
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
RH - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.34%
ONEW - TBHC
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
RUSHA - TBHC
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
ASO - TBHC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More