RUN vs SHLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUN is a Hold and SHLS is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SHLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
| RUN | SHLS | RUN / SHLS | |
| Capitalization | 2.8B | 1.94B | 144% |
| EBITDA | -1.51B | 89.6M | -1,686% |
| Gain YTD | 2.054 | -16.275 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.57 | 47.38 | 48% |
| Revenue | 2.26B | 489M | 462% |
| Total Cash | 679M | 22.7M | 2,991% |
| Total Debt | 11.1B | 181M | 6,133% |
RUN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RUN | SHLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 76% |
RUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUN has been closely correlated with NOVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUN jumps, then NOVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| NOVA - RUN | 82% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| ENPH - RUN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| FCEL - RUN | 67% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SEDG - RUN | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| FSLR - RUN | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||
SHLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLS has been closely correlated with ARRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHLS jumps, then ARRY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| ARRY - SHLS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NXT - SHLS | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| RUN - SHLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| FSLR - SHLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| FCEL - SHLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||