Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs WCMFX
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57M
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUDAX has more cash in the bank: 53.9M vs. WCMFX (1.57M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: RUDAX (1.05) vs WCMFX (0.00). RUDAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: RUDAX (9 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). RUDAX (1.45) and WCMFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. WCMFX (15.00). RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: RUDAX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). RUDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.37 vs. WCMFX (-69.54). RUDAX return over 5 years is better than : -30.52 vs. WCMFX (-66.00).
| RUDAX | WCMFX | RUDAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.567 | 5.634 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.9M | 1.57M | 3,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.37 | -69.54 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.07 | -65.12 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | -66.00 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement