Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs WCMFX
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.59
Change+$0.04 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65M
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUDAX has more cash in the bank: 53.9M vs. WCMFX (2.65M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: RUDAX (1.27) vs WCMFX (0.00). RUDAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: RUDAX (9 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). RUDAX (1.45) and WCMFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. WCMFX (15.00). RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: RUDAX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). RUDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.73 vs. WCMFX (-76.13). RUDAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.15 vs. WCMFX (-64.64).
| RUDAX | WCMFX | RUDAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.024 | -70.451 | -11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.9M | 2.65M | 2,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.73 | -76.13 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.92 | -66.82 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.15 | -64.64 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement