Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. RUDAX (51.4M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.27) vs SSGSX (0.48). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RUDAX (44.75). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. RUDAX (-21.54). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.61 vs. RUDAX (-30.07).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.23 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.23 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.587 | -1.701 | 1,210% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4M | 5.12B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.48 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.54 | -2.93 | 734% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.91 | 0.24 | -10,139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.07 | -0.61 | 4,906% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.60 | 28.96 | -57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement