Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. RUDAX (52.6M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.28) vs SSGSX (0.49). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). RUDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.83 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. RUDAX (6.66).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.586 | -0.129 | -5,096% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.6M | 5.22B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.49 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.83 | -12.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.16 | -6.25 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.66 | 8.71 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.31 | 20.45 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement