Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. RUDAX (61.8M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.34) vs SSGSX (0.51). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). RUDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. RUDAX (26.21).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.036 | -2.068 | -244% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.8M | 5.82B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.51 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.15 | -1.26 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.78 | 2.38 | -243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 29.33 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.16 | 16.52 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement