Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.75
Change+$0.70 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.06B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.06B vs. RUDAX (53.9M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.05) vs SSGSX (0.61). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RUDAX (44.75). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.46 vs. RUDAX (-17.37). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -1.72 vs. RUDAX (-30.52).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.23 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.23 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.567 | 6.847 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.9M | 5.06B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.61 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.37 | 1.46 | -1,190% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.07 | 0.11 | -22,704% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | -1.72 | 1,772% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.52 | 52.79 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers