RUBNF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.03 (+75.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
59.87M
TCOR
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.01 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RUBNF vs TCOR

Header iconRUBNF vs TCOR Comparison
Open Charts RUBNF vs TCORBanner chart's image
ARBORGEN
Price$0.07
Change+$0.03 (+75.00%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization59.87M
TreeCon Resources
Price$0.60
Change-$0.01 (-1.64%)
Volume$80.62K
Capitalization6.89M
RUBNF vs TCOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RUBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RUBNF vs. TCOR commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUBNF is a Buy and TCOR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RUBNF: $0.07 vs. TCOR: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: RUBNF and TCOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RUBNF: 305% vs. TCOR: 264%
Market capitalization -- RUBNF: $59.87M vs. TCOR: $6.89M
RUBNF [@Forest Products] is valued at $59.87M. TCOR’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $6.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RUBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCOR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RUBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCOR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCOR is a better buy in the long-term than RUBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RUBNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RUBNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TCOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCOR is a better buy in the short-term than RUBNF.

Price Growth

RUBNF (@Forest Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCOR (@Forest Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-2.45% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUBNF($59.9M) has a higher market cap than TCOR($6.89M). RUBNF YTD gains are higher at: 16.667 vs. TCOR (13.208).
RUBNFTCORRUBNF / TCOR
Capitalization59.9M6.89M870%
EBITDA37MN/A-
Gain YTD16.66713.208126%
P/E Ratio196.08N/A-
Revenue74.7MN/A-
Total Cash8.88MN/A-
Total Debt56.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUBNF vs TCOR: Fundamental Ratings
RUBNF
TCOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
918
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCOR's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBNF (92). This means that TCOR’s stock grew similarly to RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBNF (100). This means that TCOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCOR's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RUBNF (91). This means that TCOR’s stock grew significantly faster than RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.

RUBNF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TCOR (49). This means that RUBNF’s stock grew similarly to TCOR’s over the last 12 months.

RUBNF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as TCOR (13). This means that RUBNF’s stock grew similarly to TCOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RUBNFTCOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RUBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOELY95.753.24
+3.50%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
WHGLY19.200.11
+0.58%
WH Group Ltd.
IIPZF10.06N/A
N/A
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
ALLDF8.25N/A
N/A
ALD S A
CPNFF0.10-0.01
-8.96%
Euro Sun Mining Inc.

RUBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBNF and IFSPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBNF and IFSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBNF
1D Price
Change %
RUBNF100%
N/A
IFSPF - RUBNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
WFG - RUBNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
TCOR - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWGL - RUBNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-7.21%
More

TCOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCOR and WFSTF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCOR and WFSTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCOR
1D Price
Change %
TCOR100%
N/A
WFSTF - TCOR
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUBNF - TCOR
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMTC - TCOR
0%
Poorly correlated
-11.88%
SVCBF - TCOR
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWGL - TCOR
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.21%
More