Advertisement
RUBNF vs SVCBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUBNF is a Hold and SVCBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RUBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SVCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUBNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVCBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUBNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SVCBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RUBNF (@Forest Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVCBF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +9.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.66%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.75%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (+0.01% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
@Pulp & Paper (+3.46% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| RUBNF | SVCBF | RUBNF / SVCBF | |
| Capitalization | 34.8M | 9.65B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 16.4M | 7.32B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 16.667 | 12.163 | 137% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 24.54 | - |
| Revenue | 111M | 20.9B | 1% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 74M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 544M | - |
RUBNF | SVCBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SVCBF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBNF (92). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.
SVCBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBNF (100). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.
SVCBF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBNF (92). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to RUBNF’s over the last 12 months.
RUBNF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCBF (51). This means that RUBNF’s stock grew similarly to SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.
RUBNF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVCBF (76). This means that RUBNF’s stock grew significantly faster than SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.
| RUBNF | SVCBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 29% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
RUBNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBNF and IFSPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBNF and IFSPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUBNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUBNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IFSPF - RUBNF | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
| WFG - RUBNF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| TCOR - RUBNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCABY - RUBNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NWGL - RUBNF | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||
SVCBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SVCBF and WFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVCBF and WFG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SVCBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVCBF | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| WFG - SVCBF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| IFSPF - SVCBF | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
| TCOR - SVCBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HMTC - SVCBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RUBNF - SVCBF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||