RUBNF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
37.78M
SCABY
Price
$13.68
Change
+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RUBNF vs SCABY

Header iconRUBNF vs SCABY Comparison
Open Charts RUBNF vs SCABYBanner chart's image
ARBORGEN
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$15.24K
Capitalization37.78M
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.68
Change+$1.29 (+10.41%)
Volume$318
Capitalization9.19B
RUBNF vs SCABY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RUBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RUBNF vs. SCABY commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUBNF is a Hold and SCABY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (RUBNF: $0.07 vs. SCABY: $13.68)
Brand notoriety: RUBNF and SCABY are both not notable
RUBNF represents the Forest Products, while SCABY is part of the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RUBNF: 464% vs. SCABY: 18%
Market capitalization -- RUBNF: $37.78M vs. SCABY: $9.19B
RUBNF [@Forest Products] is valued at $37.78M. SCABY’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.47B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RUBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCABY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RUBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RUBNF and SCABY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RUBNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCABY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RUBNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCABY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the short-term than RUBNF.

Price Growth

RUBNF (@Forest Products) experienced а -6.14% price change this week, while SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-3.33% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Pulp & Paper (-0.64% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.19B) has a higher market cap than RUBNF($37.8M). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 23.821 vs. RUBNF (9.500). SCABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. RUBNF (16.4M). SCABY has higher revenues than RUBNF: SCABY (20.9B) vs RUBNF (111M).
RUBNFSCABYRUBNF / SCABY
Capitalization37.8M9.19B0%
EBITDA16.4M7.32B0%
Gain YTD9.50023.82140%
P/E RatioN/A23.96-
Revenue111M20.9B1%
Total CashN/A74M-
Total DebtN/A544M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUBNF: Fundamental Ratings
RUBNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RUBNFSCABY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RUBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REZ83.990.99
+1.19%
iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF
ETH39.110.15
+0.39%
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF
XFIX52.290.03
+0.06%
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
VGSH58.830.02
+0.03%
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
TRFK67.07-0.90
-1.32%
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

RUBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBNF and IFSPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBNF and IFSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBNF
1D Price
Change %
RUBNF100%
N/A
IFSPF - RUBNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
WFG - RUBNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
TCOR - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
+13.84%
SCABY - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
+10.37%
NWGL - RUBNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
+10.37%
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STLJF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More