RUBNF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
SCABY
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.88 (-6.32%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

RUBNF vs SCABY

Header iconRUBNF vs SCABY Comparison
Open Charts RUBNF vs SCABYBanner chart's image
ARBORGEN
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.05
Change-$0.88 (-6.32%)
Volume$207
CapitalizationN/A
RUBNF vs SCABY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RUBNF vs. SCABY commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUBNF is a Hold and SCABY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (RUBNF: $0.06 vs. SCABY: $13.05)
Brand notoriety: RUBNF and SCABY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RUBNF: 1% vs. SCABY: 97%
Market capitalization -- RUBNF: $59.87M vs. SCABY: $9.32B
RUBNF [@Forest Products] is valued at $59.87M. SCABY’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $9.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RUBNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCABY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RUBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the long-term than RUBNF.

Price Growth

RUBNF (@Forest Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCABY (@Forest Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-0.89% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.32B) has a higher market cap than RUBNF($59.9M). RUBNF has higher P/E ratio than SCABY: RUBNF (196.08) vs SCABY (18.69). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 2.361 vs. RUBNF (-33.333). SCABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.26B vs. RUBNF (37M). SCABY has more cash in the bank: 222M vs. RUBNF (8.88M). SCABY has higher revenues than RUBNF: SCABY (19.3B) vs RUBNF (74.7M).
RUBNFSCABYRUBNF / SCABY
Capitalization59.9M9.32B1%
EBITDA37M8.26B0%
Gain YTD-33.3332.361-1,412%
P/E Ratio196.0818.691,049%
Revenue74.7M19.3B0%
Total Cash8.88M222M4%
Total Debt56.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUBNF: Fundamental Ratings
RUBNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

RUBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBNF and IFSPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBNF and IFSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBNF
1D Price
Change %
RUBNF100%
N/A
IFSPF - RUBNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
WFG - RUBNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
TCOR - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - RUBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWGL - RUBNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
More

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
N/A
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
WFSTF - SCABY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
RUBNF - SCABY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCBF - SCABY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
More