RTPPF
Price
$64.06
Change
+$1.58 (+2.53%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
104.68B
SHVLF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.05 (-12.82%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
23.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RTPPF vs SHVLF

Header iconRTPPF vs SHVLF Comparison
Open Charts RTPPF vs SHVLFBanner chart's image
Rio Tinto
Price$64.06
Change+$1.58 (+2.53%)
Volume$929
Capitalization104.68B
Starcore International Mines
Price$0.34
Change-$0.05 (-12.82%)
Volume$332.11K
Capitalization23.02M
RTPPF vs SHVLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RTPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTPPF vs. SHVLF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTPPF is a Hold and SHVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RTPPF: $64.06 vs. SHVLF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: RTPPF and SHVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTPPF: 13% vs. SHVLF: 501%
Market capitalization -- RTPPF: $104.68B vs. SHVLF: $23.02M
RTPPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $104.68B. SHVLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $23.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHVLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHVLF is a better buy in the long-term than RTPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTPPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHVLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RTPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHVLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHVLF is a better buy in the short-term than RTPPF.

Price Growth

RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while SHVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPPF($105B) has a higher market cap than SHVLF($23M). SHVLF YTD gains are higher at: 307.543 vs. RTPPF (18.210).
RTPPFSHVLFRTPPF / SHVLF
Capitalization105B23M456,522%
EBITDA22BN/A-
Gain YTD18.210307.5436%
P/E Ratio10.20N/A-
Revenue53.7BN/A-
Total Cash9.33BN/A-
Total Debt23.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTPPF vs SHVLF: Fundamental Ratings
RTPPF
SHVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6851
SMR RATING
1..100
9994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5235
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTPPF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHVLF (51). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHVLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (68). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (99). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (52). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (51). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTPPFSHVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCLHF1.300.02
+1.56%
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd.
GRPOF0.75N/A
N/A
GRUPO TRAXION S A B DE C V
EVVTY84.86-1.01
-1.18%
Evolution AB
JETMF0.65-0.01
-1.59%
Global Crossing Airlines Group Inc.
BDCC0.05N/A
-1.96%
Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.

RTPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTPPF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTPPF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTPPF
1D Price
Change %
RTPPF100%
N/A
RIO - RTPPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
MP - RTPPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.02%
BHP - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
VALE - RTPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
CMP - RTPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
More

SHVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHVLF and GBEI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHVLF and GBEI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHVLF
1D Price
Change %
SHVLF100%
-14.10%
GBEI - SHVLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTPPF - SHVLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILEF - SHVLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+10.17%
SBWFF - SHVLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - SHVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More