RTPPF
Price
$85.33
Change
+$2.26 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
138.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHVLF
Price
$0.77
Change
+$0.02 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
68.59M
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RTPPF vs SHVLF

Header iconRTPPF vs SHVLF Comparison
Open Charts RTPPF vs SHVLFBanner chart's image
Rio Tinto
Price$85.33
Change+$2.26 (+2.72%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization138.63B
Starcore International Mines
Price$0.77
Change+$0.02 (+2.67%)
Volume$24.02K
Capitalization68.59M
RTPPF vs SHVLF Comparison Chart in %
RTPPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHVLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTPPF vs. SHVLF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTPPF is a Hold and SHVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (RTPPF: $85.33 vs. SHVLF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: RTPPF and SHVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTPPF: 20% vs. SHVLF: 15%
Market capitalization -- RTPPF: $138.63B vs. SHVLF: $68.59M
RTPPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $138.63B. SHVLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $68.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTPPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHVLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHVLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHVLF is a better buy in the long-term than RTPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTPPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHVLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RTPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHVLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTPPF is a better buy in the short-term than SHVLF.

Price Growth

RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while SHVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHVLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.98% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPPF($139B) has a higher market cap than SHVLF($68.6M). SHVLF YTD gains are higher at: 8.657 vs. RTPPF (7.567).
RTPPFSHVLFRTPPF / SHVLF
Capitalization139B68.6M202,624%
EBITDA22BN/A-
Gain YTD7.5678.65787%
P/E Ratio13.59N/A-
Revenue53.7BN/A-
Total Cash9.33BN/A-
Total Debt23.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTPPF vs SHVLF: Fundamental Ratings
RTPPF
SHVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7780
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5315
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTPPF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHVLF (48). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHVLF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTPPF (53). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (99). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVLF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (40). This means that SHVLF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SHVLF (22). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to SHVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTPPFSHVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTPPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHVLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNTTF0.26N/A
N/A
XR IMMERSIVE TECH INC.
CGMBF0.50N/A
N/A
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
JNDOF22.75N/A
N/A
Jins Hldgs Inc.
PREKF19.24-0.13
-0.67%
Prairiesky Royalty Ltd.
SRCRF0.25-0.01
-3.23%
Scorpio Gold Corp.

RTPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTPPF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTPPF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTPPF
1D Price
Change %
RTPPF100%
+2.72%
RIO - RTPPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
PMETF - RTPPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
IIDDY - RTPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHP - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
NEXA - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.85%
More

SHVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHVLF and SBWFF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHVLF and SBWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHVLF
1D Price
Change %
SHVLF100%
+3.22%
SBWFF - SHVLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILEF - SHVLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
SHERF - SHVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
RKMSF - SHVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
RTPPF - SHVLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
More