RTNTF
Price
$73.22
Change
+$2.41 (+3.40%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
126.65B
SCCFF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.10 (-24.39%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
18.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RTNTF vs SCCFF

Header iconRTNTF vs SCCFF Comparison
Open Charts RTNTF vs SCCFFBanner chart's image
Rio Tinto
Price$73.22
Change+$2.41 (+3.40%)
Volume$419
Capitalization126.65B
Strategic Resources
Price$0.31
Change-$0.10 (-24.39%)
Volume$180
Capitalization18.14M
RTNTF vs SCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RTNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTNTF vs. SCCFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNTF is a Hold and SCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RTNTF: $73.22 vs. SCCFF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: RTNTF and SCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTNTF: 48% vs. SCCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RTNTF: $126.65B vs. SCCFF: $18.14M
RTNTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $126.65B. SCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RTNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTNTF is a better buy in the long-term than SCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTNTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RTNTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTNTF is a better buy in the short-term than SCCFF.

Price Growth

RTNTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.94% price change this week, while SCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTNTF($127B) has a higher market cap than SCCFF($18.1M). RTNTF YTD gains are higher at: 2.909 vs. SCCFF (-32.805).
RTNTFSCCFFRTNTF / SCCFF
Capitalization127B18.1M701,657%
EBITDA20.7BN/A-
Gain YTD2.909-32.805-9%
P/E Ratio14.95N/A-
Revenue52.4BN/A-
Total Cash10.5BN/A-
Total Debt14.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTNTF vs SCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
RTNTF
SCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5585
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTNTF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (23). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

RTNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (100). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RTNTF (99). This means that SCCFF’s stock grew similarly to RTNTF’s over the last 12 months.

RTNTF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (85). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

RTNTF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (100). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTNTFSCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLMB112.203.31
+3.04%
Climb Global Solutions
BEP26.640.62
+2.38%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
JNJ156.010.45
+0.29%
Johnson & Johnson
CLDX22.00-0.11
-0.50%
Celldex Therapeutics
CELU1.98-0.05
-2.46%
Celularity

RTNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTNTF and VALE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTNTF and VALE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTNTF
1D Price
Change %
RTNTF100%
+3.13%
VALE - RTNTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
TGB - RTNTF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
LEU - RTNTF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
HBM - RTNTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
FSUGY - RTNTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

SCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCFF has been loosely correlated with FXRVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCCFF jumps, then FXRVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCFF
1D Price
Change %
SCCFF100%
N/A
FXRVF - SCCFF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NLIBF - SCCFF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UAMY - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
LUCMF - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
RTNTF - SCCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More