Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNSX vs VFWPX
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNSX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq S
Price$15.33
Change+$1.07 (+7.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNSX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. RTNSX (5.57B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNSX: VFWPX (2.93) vs RTNSX (1.98). RTNSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNSX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). RTNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNSX (35.08) and VFWPX (34.29) have marching annual gain over last year. RTNSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.61 vs. VFWPX (34.77).
| RTNSX | VFWPX | RTNSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.03 | 3,567% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.163 | 6.471 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 78.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.08 | 34.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.75 | 47.98 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.61 | 34.77 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.85 | 110.45 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers