Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$14.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.46
Change+$0.47 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RTNCX (5.17B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.69) vs RTNCX (0.71). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (21.84) and RTNCX (21.43) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.87 vs. RTNCX (29.24).
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.760 | 26.993 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 75.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 2.69 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.43 | 21.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.95 | 42.46 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 31.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.34 | 73.55 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement