Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNAX vs VFWPX
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
Price$14.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.46
Change+$0.47 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RTNAX (5.17B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: VFWPX (2.69) vs RTNAX (1.40). RTNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNAX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNAX (22.18) and VFWPX (22.05) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX (31.55) and RTNAX (31.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNAX | VFWPX | RTNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.03 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.03 | 4,633% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.353 | 27.848 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 75.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 2.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.18 | 22.05 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 43.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.07 | 31.55 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.08 | 74.72 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers