RTBRF
Price
$1.69
Change
+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
214.77M
SIRZF
Price
$10.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
89.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RTBRF vs SIRZF

Header iconRTBRF vs SIRZF Comparison
Open Charts RTBRF vs SIRZFBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.69
Change+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization214.77M
Sir Rty Income Fund
Price$10.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$202
Capitalization89.26M
RTBRF vs SIRZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTBRF vs. SIRZF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTBRF is a Hold and SIRZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RTBRF: $1.49 vs. SIRZF: $10.80)
Brand notoriety: RTBRF and SIRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTBRF: 11% vs. SIRZF: 118%
Market capitalization -- RTBRF: $214.77M vs. SIRZF: $89.26M
RTBRF [@Restaurants] is valued at $214.77M. SIRZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $89.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTBRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIRZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIRZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIRZF is a better buy in the long-term than RTBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTBRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIRZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SIRZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the short-term than SIRZF.

Price Growth

RTBRF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIRZF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.28% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($215M) has a higher market cap than SIRZF($89.3M). RTBRF has higher P/E ratio than SIRZF: RTBRF (13.95) vs SIRZF (12.05). SIRZF YTD gains are higher at: 20.000 vs. RTBRF (-5.096). RTBRF has higher revenues than SIRZF: RTBRF (1.41B) vs SIRZF (14.8M).
RTBRFSIRZFRTBRF / SIRZF
Capitalization215M89.3M241%
EBITDA160MN/A-
Gain YTD-5.09620.000-25%
P/E Ratio13.9512.05116%
Revenue1.41B14.8M9,527%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF vs SIRZF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
SIRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4144
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
9063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIRZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (12). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RTBRF (100). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew significantly faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (90). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTBRF (82). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RTBRF (78). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew significantly faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTBRFSIRZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMLF945.35N/A
N/A
ASML Holding N.V.
HHULF18.62N/A
N/A
Hamburger Hafen Und Logistik Ag
PSORF13.83N/A
N/A
Pearson PLC
SUND0.40N/A
N/A
Sundance Strategies Inc.
RENEF12.12N/A
N/A
Cartesian Growth Corporation II

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - RTBRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
FWRG - RTBRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIRZF and DRI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIRZF and DRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIRZF
1D Price
Change %
SIRZF100%
N/A
DRI - SIRZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
GAMN - SIRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - SIRZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFCGF - SIRZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More