RSTRF
Price
$65.56
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
21.32B
SSPPF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.18 (-7.66%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSTRF vs SSPPF

Header iconRSTRF vs SSPPF Comparison
Open Charts RSTRF vs SSPPFBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
Price$65.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$200
Capitalization21.32B
SSP Group
Price$2.17
Change-$0.18 (-7.66%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.7B
RSTRF vs SSPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSTRF vs. SSPPF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSTRF is a Hold and SSPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (RSTRF: $64.95 vs. SSPPF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: RSTRF and SSPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSTRF: 51% vs. SSPPF: 18%
Market capitalization -- RSTRF: $21.32B vs. SSPPF: $1.7B
RSTRF [@Restaurants] is valued at $21.32B. SSPPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RSTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the long-term than SSPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSTRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RSTRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RSTRF and SSPPF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RSTRF (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while SSPPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSTRF($21.3B) has a higher market cap than SSPPF($1.7B). SSPPF has higher P/E ratio than RSTRF: SSPPF (46.06) vs RSTRF (24.56). RSTRF YTD gains are higher at: -5.143 vs. SSPPF (-14.902). SSPPF has less debt than RSTRF: SSPPF (2.11B) vs RSTRF (16B).
RSTRFSSPPFRSTRF / SSPPF
Capitalization21.3B1.7B1,257%
EBITDAN/A588M-
Gain YTD-5.143-14.90235%
P/E Ratio24.5646.0653%
RevenueN/A3.58B-
Total CashN/A207M-
Total Debt16B2.11B757%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSTRF vs SSPPF: Fundamental Ratings
RSTRF
SSPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
4096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSPPF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RSTRF (97). This means that SSPPF’s stock grew similarly to RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSPPF (100). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSPPF (96). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SSPPF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RSTRF (59). This means that SSPPF’s stock grew similarly to RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSPPF (99). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSTRFSSPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCHB13.450.31
+2.36%
Mechanics Bancorp
XHLD0.32N/A
+1.06%
TEN Holdings Inc
TEVA19.27-0.18
-0.93%
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
KRNT14.50-0.16
-1.09%
Kornit Digital Ltd
DLNG3.64-0.07
-1.81%
Dynagas LNG Parners LP

RSTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSTRF and MTYFF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSTRF and MTYFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSTRF
1D Price
Change %
RSTRF100%
N/A
MTYFF - RSTRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
PZRIF - RSTRF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - RSTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - RSTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - RSTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SSPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSPPF and FWRG have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSPPF and FWRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSPPF
1D Price
Change %
SSPPF100%
N/A
FWRG - SSPPF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
BROS - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
ALSSF - SSPPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - SSPPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMN - SSPPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More