Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs SSGSX
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$13.44
Change-$0.11 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets490.72M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. RSQCX (491M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSQCX (1.70) vs SSGSX (0.50). RSQCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSQCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). RSQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSQCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.53 vs. RSQCX (-11.40). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. RSQCX (-9.69).
| RSQCX | SSGSX | RSQCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.467 | -2.025 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 491M | 5.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.50 | 339% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.40 | -5.53 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.03 | -9.76 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.69 | 15.88 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.23 | 15.23 | -205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers