Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs SSGSX
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$14.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.91M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. RSQCX (508M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSQCX (1.60) vs SSGSX (0.47). RSQCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSQCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). RSQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSQCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. RSQCX (-5.46). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. RSQCX (-5.08).
| RSQCX | SSGSX | RSQCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.177 | 2.046 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 5.64B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.47 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.46 | -1.56 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.61 | 3.97 | -141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | 22.95 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.35 | 24.71 | -107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement