Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSPKX vs SSGSX
RSPKX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSPKX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
RSPKX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSPKX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSPKX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. RSPKX (562M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than RSPKX: SSGSX (0.47) vs RSPKX (0.03). RSPKX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSPKX (19 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RSPKX (2.42) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RSPKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RSPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSPKX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). RSPKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.54 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). RSPKX return over 5 years is better than : 39.40 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| RSPKX | SSGSX | RSPKX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.26 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.42 | 1.26 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.242 | 2.046 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 5.64B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.47 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | -1.56 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.17 | 3.97 | 382% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | 22.95 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.61 | 24.71 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement