Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSPFX vs SSGSX
RSPFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSPFX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
RSPFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSPFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSPFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. RSPFX (545M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than RSPFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs RSPFX (0.44). RSPFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSPFX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RSPFX (1.33) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RSPFX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RSPFX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. RSPFX (-9.14). RSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.13 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| RSPFX | SSGSX | RSPFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.570 | -1.034 | 249% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 545M | 5.31B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.48 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.14 | -8.48 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.60 | 1.10 | 1,239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.13 | 18.06 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.89 | 18.76 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers