RSNUF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
312.89M
SGML
Price
$7.03
Change
+$0.29 (+4.30%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.54B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSNUF vs SGML

Header iconRSNUF vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts RSNUF vs SGMLBanner chart's image
RENASCOR RES
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization312.89M
Sigma Lithium
Price$7.03
Change+$0.29 (+4.30%)
Volume$1.69K
Capitalization1.54B
RSNUF vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSNUF vs. SGML commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSNUF is a Hold and SGML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (RSNUF: $0.03 vs. SGML: $6.74)
Brand notoriety: RSNUF and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSNUF: 100% vs. SGML: 143%
Market capitalization -- RSNUF: $312.89M vs. SGML: $1.54B
RSNUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $312.89M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSNUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSNUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the long-term than RSNUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGML’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SGML’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RSNUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.93% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than RSNUF($313M). SGML YTD gains are higher at: -39.929 vs. RSNUF (-45.667). RSNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.81M vs. SGML (-82.05M). SGML has more cash in the bank: 38.1M vs. RSNUF (1.86M).
RSNUFSGMLRSNUF / SGML
Capitalization313M1.54B20%
EBITDA-1.81M-82.05M2%
Gain YTD-45.667-39.929114%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A130M-
Total Cash1.86M38.1M5%
Total DebtN/A157M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSNUFSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDOAX11.15N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity A
CDOZX39.89-0.04
-0.10%
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Inst
THISX76.28-0.46
-0.60%
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences I
PPQPX7.91-0.05
-0.63%
Principal MidCap Growth III R5
HGHSX35.89-0.24
-0.66%
Hartford Healthcare R4

RSNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNUF and SGML have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNUF and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNUF
1D Price
Change %
RSNUF100%
N/A
SGML - RSNUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
FNICF - RSNUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
CLRSF - RSNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
+1.35%
LAR - SGML
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
LAC - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.88%
FCX - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SCCO - SGML
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
BHP - SGML
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
More