Advertisement
RSHPF vs SILA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSHPF is a Hold and SILA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RSHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSILA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RSHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SILA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RSHPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RSHPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SILA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RSHPF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SILA (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
SILA is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+1.30% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.62% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| RSHPF | SILA | RSHPF / SILA | |
| Capitalization | 641M | 1.34B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 56.1M | 141M | 40% |
| Gain YTD | 1.382 | 4.547 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.65 | 34.32 | 49% |
| Revenue | 85.1M | 193M | 44% |
| Total Cash | 7.29M | 27.7M | 26% |
| Total Debt | 558M | 715M | 78% |
RSHPF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSHPF | SILA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LKSMX | 11.74 | 0.02 | +0.17% |
| LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional | |||
| FIKWX | 13.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z | |||
| SDYAX | 16.52 | -0.15 | -0.90% |
| SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation F (SIMT) | |||
| TPLIX | 13.48 | -0.15 | -1.10% |
| Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth I | |||
| MIGBX | 29.56 | -0.58 | -1.92% |
| MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B | |||
RSHPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSHPF and IIPZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSHPF and IIPZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSHPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IIPZF - RSHPF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SILA - RSHPF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| RIOCF - RSHPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| PPRQF - RSHPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RFNDF - RSHPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SILA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILA has been loosely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILA jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILA | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| EQR - SILA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| GLPI - SILA | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| PSA - SILA | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| CPT - SILA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| IRT - SILA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||