RSGUF
Price
$4.05
Change
-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
501.75M
SGLJF
Price
$15.04
Change
-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSGUF vs SGLJF

Header iconRSGUF vs SGLJF Comparison
Open Charts RSGUF vs SGLJFBanner chart's image
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.05
Change-$0.11 (-2.64%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization501.75M
Strauss Group
Price$15.04
Change-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Volume$564
Capitalization2.09B
RSGUF vs SGLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSGUF vs. SGLJF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSGUF is a Hold and SGLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (RSGUF: $4.05 vs. SGLJF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: RSGUF and SGLJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSGUF: 133% vs. SGLJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RSGUF: $501.75M vs. SGLJF: $2.09B
RSGUF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $501.75M. SGLJF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGLJF is a better buy in the long-term than RSGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSGUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while SGLJF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLJF($2.09B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($502M). SGLJF has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: SGLJF (20.16) vs RSGUF (12.55). SGLJF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RSGUF (-0.880). SGLJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.18B vs. RSGUF (119M). SGLJF has more cash in the bank: 517M vs. RSGUF (5.83M). RSGUF has less debt than SGLJF: RSGUF (445M) vs SGLJF (2.63B). SGLJF has higher revenues than RSGUF: SGLJF (6.8B) vs RSGUF (1.13B).
RSGUFSGLJFRSGUF / SGLJF
Capitalization502M2.09B24%
EBITDA119M1.18B10%
Gain YTD-0.8800.000-
P/E Ratio12.5520.1662%
Revenue1.13B6.8B17%
Total Cash5.83M517M1%
Total Debt445M2.63B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSGUF vs SGLJF: Fundamental Ratings
RSGUF
SGLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2742
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
5542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5173
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (20). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (55). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (73). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (65). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OALGX21.640.17
+0.79%
Optimum Large Cap Growth A
PLGJX10.470.08
+0.77%
Principal LargeCap Growth I J
FCLCX41.50N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Industrials C
TNBRX19.67N/A
N/A
1290 SmartBeta Equity R
FCAJX12.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action A

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
-2.55%
LW - RSGUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
TATYY - RSGUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
TATYF - RSGUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLJF - RSGUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLJF has been loosely correlated with AKEJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGLJF jumps, then AKEJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLJF
1D Price
Change %
SGLJF100%
N/A
AKEJF - SGLJF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SUEZY - SGLJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SGLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
PIFMY - SGLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSGUF - SGLJF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More