RSGUF
Price
$4.66
Change
+$0.02 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
592.54M
SGLJF
Price
$15.04
Change
-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSGUF vs SGLJF

Header iconRSGUF vs SGLJF Comparison
Open Charts RSGUF vs SGLJFBanner chart's image
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization592.54M
Strauss Group
Price$15.04
Change-$2.56 (-14.55%)
Volume$564
Capitalization3.15B
RSGUF vs SGLJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSGUF vs. SGLJF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSGUF is a Hold and SGLJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RSGUF: $4.64 vs. SGLJF: $15.04)
Brand notoriety: RSGUF and SGLJF are both not notable
RSGUF represents the Food: Specialty/Candy, while SGLJF is part of the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSGUF: 8% vs. SGLJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RSGUF: $592.54M vs. SGLJF: $3.15B
RSGUF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $592.54M. SGLJF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGLJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than SGLJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSGUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while SGLJF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.16% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGLJF($3.15B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($593M). SGLJF has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: SGLJF (20.08) vs RSGUF (13.06). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 13.936 vs. SGLJF (0.000). SGLJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. RSGUF (145M). SGLJF has more cash in the bank: 436M vs. RSGUF (26.6M). RSGUF has less debt than SGLJF: RSGUF (381M) vs SGLJF (2.47B). SGLJF has higher revenues than RSGUF: SGLJF (7.25B) vs RSGUF (1.3B).
RSGUFSGLJFRSGUF / SGLJF
Capitalization593M3.15B19%
EBITDA145M1.55B9%
Gain YTD13.9360.000-
P/E Ratio13.0620.0865%
Revenue1.3B7.25B18%
Total Cash26.6M436M6%
Total Debt381M2.47B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSGUF vs SGLJF: Fundamental Ratings
RSGUF
SGLJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
5242
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4574
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3645

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (17). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGLJF (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (52). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLJF (74). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SGLJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLJF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (66). This means that SGLJF’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCCIX16.740.23
+1.39%
JHancock Small Cap Core I
SSCDX18.600.23
+1.25%
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth I
GLFOX17.320.12
+0.70%
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
PCLVX22.860.14
+0.62%
PACE Large Co Value Equity P
WRAIX14.190.04
+0.28%
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities I

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
+0.51%
LW - RSGUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
TATYY - RSGUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TATYF - RSGUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLJF - RSGUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGLJF has been loosely correlated with AKEJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGLJF jumps, then AKEJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLJF
1D Price
Change %
SGLJF100%
N/A
AKEJF - SGLJF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SUEZY - SGLJF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRBZF - SGLJF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - SGLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
RSGUF - SGLJF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More