Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSECX vs RWMFX
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$17.94
Change-$0.27 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.27B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSECX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSECX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. RSECX (3.27B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSECX: RWMFX (1.41) vs RSECX (0.04). RSECX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSECX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSECX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. RSECX (-0.40). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. RSECX (29.56).
| RSECX | RWMFX | RSECX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.31 | 629% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.599 | 11.486 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 209B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.41 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.40 | 5.30 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.43 | 32.83 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.56 | 47.43 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.86 | 82.53 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement