Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSECX vs RWMFX
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSECX vs RWMFX
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity C
Price$16.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
RSECX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSECX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSECX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. RSECX (2.96B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSECX: RWMFX (1.38) vs RSECX (0.04). RSECX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSECX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSECX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSECX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. RSECX (0.55). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. RSECX (10.69).
| RSECX | RWMFX | RSECX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.31 | 629% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.057 | 8.281 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.38 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.55 | 6.14 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.00 | 33.03 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.69 | 42.32 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.90 | 81.05 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers