Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRSVX vs SSGSX
RRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RRSVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
RRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. RRSVX (4.36M). RRSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RRSVX (1.05) vs SSGSX (0.47). RRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RRSVX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RRSVX (30.87) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs RRSVX (250000). RRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.63 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). RRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 62.48 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| RRSVX | SSGSX | RRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.26 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 30.87 | 1.26 | 2,450% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.446 | 2.046 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.36M | 5.64B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.47 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | -1.56 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.33 | 3.97 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.48 | 22.95 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement